“Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165–181. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. “Reflections on the New Deal: The Vested Interests, Limits to Reform, and the Meaning of Liberal Democracy.” Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. ![]() “The Social Market Economy Revisited: The German Variety of Capitalism in Retrospect.” Izmir Review of Social Sciences 1 (1): 7–18. “The Political Economy of Meritocracy: A Post-Kaleckian, Post-Olsonian Approach to Unemployment and Income Inequality in Modern Varieties of Capitalism.” Review of Radical Political Economics 40 (1): 67–88. “German Social Democratic Economic Politics in the Light of Agenda Theory.” Intervention Journal of Economis 2 (2): 131–151. Deregulation and Employment in Great Britain and Germany: Anglo-German Foundation Report. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by A. “The Cold War and the Welfare State.” The American Interest. We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. The Evolution of the British Welfare State. “Trends and Driving Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in the OECD area.” OECD Social Policies Studies Division, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Paper No. Oxford: Oxford University Press.įörster, M. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by A. “Cracks in the Foundations: Retrenchment in Advanced Welfare States.” Economic Sociology 16 (3): 4–16.Įsping-Andersen, G. “The Democratic Class Struggle Revisited: The Welfare State, Social Cohesion and Political Conflict.” Acta Sociologica 58 (4): 311–328.Įlsässer, L., I. “Risk-Sharing and Social Justice: The Motivational Foundations of the Post-War Welfare State.” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 1–34.Įdlund, J., and A. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.ĭryzek, J., and R. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.ĭahl, R. ![]() “Income Redistribution through Taxes and Transfers across OECD Countries.” Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Working Paper Series No. Les Metamorphoses de la question social: Une chronique du salariat. “Income Inequality and Fiscal Redistribution in 47 LIS Countries: 1967–2014.” Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Working Paper Series No. “Introduction: Democratic Elitism Reappraised.” Comparative Sociology 8 (2): 323–344.Ĭaminada, K., J. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.īest, H., and J. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Guilded Age. “Ameco Database.” Annual macro-economic database of the European Commission's Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs.īartels, L. ![]() “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 496–512.Īmeco Database. Content Author and article informationĪllan, J., and L. And the neoliberal attack on the welfare state since the 1980s is not a necessary re-calibration due to changing economic conditions or a growing lack of solidarity among the people but an expression of a modified cost–benefit analysis from the elite's perspective. Yet the core of the welfare state conception serves the interest of the meritocracy as much as those who benefit from social programs and redistribution. The particular design of welfare state organization was the subject-matter of political conflict, and a clear distinction between liberal and coordinated market economies can be attributed to cultural differences and institutional settings. Under the very peculiar circumstances of the post-WW2 era, this even translated into a rise in social welfare spending to more than a third of national income. The welfare state is not the result of a long social struggle on the part of the needy rather, it results in its general features from the minimal state of meritocratic exigencies. It will be argued that in a liberal democracy, the elite has the framing and agenda-setting power to “manufacture a political will” according to its interests. This article attempts to shed some light on the developments of welfare states in highly developed nations since World War Two (WW2) within the context of a narrative which seeks to combine institutional distinctions, termed “varieties of capitalism,” with the historical regimes of regulation theory in a political economy perspective which puts interested political actors at center stage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |